Friday, December 2, 2011

Differing laws on trafficking impede US crackdown

In this Tuesday, Nov. 22, 2011 photo, Holly Smith, 33, talks about her experiences when she was caught up in a child sex trafficking ring during an interview in her home in Richmond, Va. A new report says 41 states have failed to adopt strong penalties against human trafficking, and advocates say a patchwork of differing state laws makes it difficult for authorities to target the crime. Smith said a man at a mall promised her a job after she ran away from home at age 14. She said she was swiftly brought to a motel where two adults gave her a dress, put makeup on her face and dyed her hair. ?Within hours I was on the streets of Atlantic City having men forced on me,? said Smith. (AP Photo/Steve Helber)

In this Tuesday, Nov. 22, 2011 photo, Holly Smith, 33, talks about her experiences when she was caught up in a child sex trafficking ring during an interview in her home in Richmond, Va. A new report says 41 states have failed to adopt strong penalties against human trafficking, and advocates say a patchwork of differing state laws makes it difficult for authorities to target the crime. Smith said a man at a mall promised her a job after she ran away from home at age 14. She said she was swiftly brought to a motel where two adults gave her a dress, put makeup on her face and dyed her hair. ?Within hours I was on the streets of Atlantic City having men forced on me,? said Smith. (AP Photo/Steve Helber)

In this Tuesday, Nov. 22, 2011 photo, Holly Smith, 33, talks about her experiences when she was caught up in a child sex trafficking ring during an interview in her home in Richmond, Va. A new report says 41 states have failed to adopt strong penalties against human trafficking, and advocates say a patchwork of differing state laws makes it difficult for authorities to target the crime. Smith said a man at a mall promised her a job after she ran away from home at age 14. She said she was swiftly brought to a motel where two adults gave her a dress, put makeup on her face and dyed her hair. ?Within hours I was on the streets of Atlantic City having men forced on me,? said Smith. (AP Photo/Steve Helber)

In this Tuesday, Nov. 22, 2011 photo, Holly Smith, 33, talks about her experiences when she was caught up in a child sex trafficking ring during an interview in her home in Richmond, Va. A new report says 41 states have failed to adopt strong penalties against human trafficking, and advocates say a patchwork of differing state laws makes it difficult for authorities to target the crime. Smith said a man at a mall promised her a job after she ran away from home at age 14. She said she was swiftly brought to a motel where two adults gave her a dress, put makeup on her face and dyed her hair. ?Within hours I was on the streets of Atlantic City having men forced on me,? said Smith. (AP Photo/Steve Helber)

A new report says 41 states have failed to adopt strong penalties against human trafficking, and advocates say a patchwork of differing state laws makes it difficult for authorities to target the crime.

In Connecticut, for instance, the strict penalties for sex traffickers are among the toughest in the nation. Neighboring Massachusetts, meanwhile, had no statute specifically targeting sex trafficking until one was signed into law days ago.

The report released Thursday by the advocacy group Shared Hope International said more than a dozen states have passed new crackdowns, but four states ? Maine, Virginia, West Virginia and Wyoming ? have yet to impose any specific restrictions on the crime.

"Each state's laws show omissions in protective provisions for child victims and (they) lack strong laws to prosecute the men who rent the bodies of other men's children," said Linda Smith, the group's founder and president.

As many as 15,000 victims of human trafficking are brought into the U.S. each year, according to advocacy groups. They say there could be more than 100,000 victims in the country now.

Victims are sometimes smuggled in from outside the U.S., but many started out as young runaways or simply needed money. Human traffickers target men, women and children for forced labor or services, while sex traffickers make their victims work in the sex trade. The crimes range from smuggling immigrants into the U.S. to work in restaurants or homes to forcing young women to work as prostitutes.

Holly Austin Smith said a man at a mall promised her a job after she ran away from home at age 14. She said she was swiftly brought to a motel in New Jersey where two adults gave her a dress, put makeup on her face and dyed her hair.

"Within hours I was on the streets of Atlantic City having men forced on me," said Smith, now 33 and an advocate of stricter sex trafficking laws.

Federal authorities can prosecute traffickers under the Trafficking Victims Protections Act, enacted in 2000, which carries stiff penalties. The law also created a new visa allowing victims of the crime to become temporary U.S. residents. But prosecutors have limited resources and often have to rely on the states to crack down on the crime.

Some states have taken aggressive steps to strengthen their laws, the report said. Fifteen states now allow victims to seek civil damages from their traffickers in court. Four states ? Illinois, Maryland, Nevada and New York ? have laws that vacate convictions for sex trafficking victims.

Other states were criticized in the report for failing to pass strict laws. The report also found that 10 states have yet to adopt sex trafficking laws and that 19 don't make it a crime to buy sex acts with a minor. It also found that Iowa, Massachusetts, South Carolina and Wyoming have no laws making it a crime to use the Internet to purchase or sell sex acts with a minor.

Washington Attorney General Robert McKenna, president of the National Association of Attorneys General, said policymakers have to play catch-up to establish consistent policies to rein in the crime.

"Having a strong, fairly uniform set of laws across the country is very important, because traffickers are mobile, their victims are mobile and we don't want traffickers to be moving their victims even more trying to evade stronger state laws, by moving to states with weaker laws," he said.

The state definitions of illegal trafficking that vary from federal standards can also make it more difficult to get additional protections and services from the U.S. government, said Kirsten Widner of the Barton Child Law and Policy Center at Emory University's School of Law.

"And if they have no definition at all, that could be a real problem," said Widner.

One high-profile battleground was Massachusetts, which for years faced pressure from advocates to enact anti-trafficking laws. In November, Gov. Deval Patrick signed a bill that would impose a life sentence on anyone found guilty of trafficking children for sex or forced labor. It also allows prosecutors to look at first-time offenders under 18 as victims rather than criminals.

"We have focused on the very people who have been victimized the most," said Attorney General Martha Coakley, who pushed for the bill. "What the bill does is change the lens around on that. That's why implementing this is going to be difficult. I think we can do it. It's a real change in the way we've approached it."

Some advocates, though, say more aggressive enforcement of the laws, instead of strict new ones, may help crack down on the crime. State authorities need to implement the laws on the books, better coordinate with federal prosecutors and spend more resources trying to identify victims, said Mary Ellison, a director of policy for the Polaris Project, a Washington, D.C.-based nonprofit group.

"Traffickers make their money on the backs of the most vulnerable and there's not as much of a risk because laws aren't implemented as strongly as they want," she said. "Until they see these laws implemented, they're not going to be deterred because they're making tons and tons of money exploiting and enslaving people."

___

Associated Press writers Steve LeBlanc in Boston, Manuel Valdes in Seattle, Wash. and Steve Helber in Midlothian, Va., contributed to this report.

Associated Press

Source: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/3d281c11a96b4ad082fe88aa0db04305/Article_2011-12-01-Child%20Sex%20Trafficking/id-4c3d0965a7b0492787a294c5faa37481

ryan torain ryan torain world series game 3 sign language alphabet texas tech texas tech giuliana rancic

VP Biden's Iraq trip designed to solidify ties (AP)

BAGHDAD ? Vice President Joe Biden's Iraq trip ahead of the U.S. military pullout is designed to solidify ties between Iraq and the United States, but already protests in Iraq against his visit are demonstrating the difficulties the relationship will face.

Biden arrived Tuesday in a surprise visit to Iraq at a pivotal time as the last of the American troops withdraw, and the U.S. must establish a new relationship with a country that is home to billions of barrels of oil and more closely aligned with neighboring Iran than the U.S. would like.

"In one month, our troops will have left Iraq and our strategic, close partnership, God willing, will continue, it will not continue in Iraq for Iraq but in this region," Biden said in a statement to reporters ahead of meetings with Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki.

"Our troops are leaving Iraq, and we are working on a new path together, a new face of this partnership," he added. "This is marking a new beginning of the relationship that will not only benefit the United States of America and Iraq. I believe it will benefit the region and will benefit the world."

The White House said Biden is expected to meet with Iraqi officials including President Jalal Talabani and Parliament Speaker Osama al-Nujaifi during what is his eighth visit to Iraq since being elected.

The White House said he is also to take part in a ceremony commemorating the sacrifices of U.S. and Iraqi troops during the eight-year war.

But he will almost certainly not be meeting with some of al-Maliki's key allies, government leaders loyal to anti-American cleric Muqtada al-Sadr. Al-Maliki is navigating a tough position of trying to maintain a relationship with the U.S., from whom Iraq is buying billions of dollars in weapons in the coming years, and al-Sadr, whose backing last year ensured al-Maliki a second term.

Followers of al-Sadr rallied in Basra and Baghdad on Wednesday, chanting "Biden get out of Iraq," and "No to America."

Baghdad and Washington failed earlier this year to come to an agreement on keeping a small American military presence in Iraq next year, meaning all U.S. forces must be out of the country by Dec. 31. Some 13,000 U.S. troops remain, down from a one-time high of about 170,000.

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/iraq/*http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20111130/ap_on_re_mi_ea/ml_iraq

molokai ashton kutcher twitter sandusky barbados raiders chargers latin grammys latin grammys

Thursday, December 1, 2011

40,000 troops to leave Afghanistan by end of 2012 (AP)

KABUL, Afghanistan ? Drawdown plans announced by the U.S. and more than a dozen other nations will shrink the foreign military footprint in Afghanistan by 40,000 troops at the close of next year, leaving Afghan forces increasingly on the frontlines of the decade-long war.

The United States is pulling out the most ? 33,000 by the end of 2012. That's one-third of 101,000 American troops who were in Afghanistan in June, the peak of U.S. military presence in the war, according to figures provided by the Pentagon.

Others in the 49-nation coalition have announced withdrawal plans too, while insisting they are not rushing to leave. Many nations have vowed to keep troops in Afghanistan to continue training the Afghan police and army in the years to come. And many have pledged to keep sending aid to the impoverished country after the international combat mission ends in 2014.

Still, the exit is making Afghans nervous.

They fear their nation could plunge into civil war once the foreign forces go home. Their confidence in the Afghan security forces has risen, but they don't share the U.S.-led coalition's stated belief that the Afghan soldiers and police will be ready to secure the entire nation in three years. Others worry the Afghan economy will collapse if foreigners leave and donors get stingy with aid.

Foreign forces began leaving Afghanistan this year.

About 14,000 foreign troops will withdraw by the end of December, according to an Associated Press review of more than a dozen nations' drawdown plans. The United States is pulling out 10,000 service members this year; Canada withdrew 2,850 combat forces this summer; France and Britain will each send about 400 home; Poland is recalling 200; and Denmark and Slovenia are pulling out about 120 combined.

Troop cutbacks will be deeper next year, when an estimated 26,000 more will leave. That figure includes 23,000 Americans, 950 Germans, 600 more French, 500 additional Britons, 400 Poles, 290 Belgians, 156 Spaniards, 100 Swedes and 50 Finns.

Gen. James F. Amos, commandant of the Marine Corps, told the AP that the number of Marines in Helmand province in southern Afghanistan will drop "markedly" in 2012, and the role of those who stay will shift from countering the insurgency to training and advising Afghan security forces.

Amos declined to discuss the number of Marines expected to leave in 2012.

There are now about 19,400 Marines in Helmand, and that is scheduled to fall to about 18,500 by the end of this year.

"Am I OK with that? The answer is `yes,'" Amos said. "We can't stay in Afghanistan forever."

"Will it work? I don't know. But I know we'll do our part."

Additional troop cuts or accelerated withdrawals are possible.

Many other countries, including Hungary and Italy, are finalizing their withdrawal schedules. Presidential elections in Europe and the European debt crisis also could speed up the pullout. Australian Prime Minister Julia Gillard said this week that Australia's training mission could be completed before the 2014 target date.

Back in June, then-U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates said that when the Obama administration begins pulling troops from Afghanistan, the U.S. will resist a rush to the exists, "and we expect the same from our allies." Gates said it was critically important that a plan for winding down NATO's combat role by the end of 2014 did not squander gains made against the Taliban that were won at great cost in lives and money.

"The more U.S. forces draw down, the more it gives the green light for our international partners to also head for the exits," said Jeffrey Dressler, a senior research analyst at the Institute for the Study of War in Washington. "There is a cyclical effect here that is hard to temper once it gets going."

U.S. Army Lt. Col. Jimmie Cummings Jr. said the cutbacks that have been announced will not affect the coalition's ability to fight the insurgency.

"We are getting more Afghans into the field and we are transferring more responsibility to them in many areas," Cummings said, adding that many leaders of the Taliban, al-Qaida and the Haqqani militant networks have been captured or killed.

Afghan security forces started taking the lead in seven areas in July. They soon will assume responsibility for many more regions as part of a gradual process that will put Afghans in charge of security across the nation by the end of 2014.

Some countries are lobbying to start transition as soon as possible in areas where they have their troops deployed ? so they can go home, said a senior NATO official, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss transition. The official insisted that those desires were not driving decisions on where Afghan troops are taking the lead.

The official said that because they want to leave, a number of troop-contributing nations faced with declining public support at home have started working harder to get their areas ready to hand off to Afghan forces.

"The big question (after 2014) is if the Afghan security forces can take on an externally based insurgency with support from the Pakistani security establishment and all that entails," Dressler said. "I think they will have a real challenge on their hands if the U.S. and NATO countries do not address Pakistani sponsorship of these groups."

___

Lekic reported from Brussels. AP National Security Writer Robert Burns in Helmand contributed to this report.

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/asia/*http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20111129/ap_on_re_as/as_afghan_troops_leaving

will rogers gabby giffords gabby giffords hunger games trailer hunger games trailer gabrielle giffords austin rivers

Couple held without bond in bloody saw slaying (Providence Journal)

Share With Friends: Share on FacebookTweet ThisPost to Google-BuzzSend on GmailPost to Linked-InSubscribe to This Feed | Rss To Twitter | Politics - Top Stories News, RSS and RSS Feed via Feedzilla.

Source: http://news.feedzilla.com/en_us/stories/politics/top-stories/168194871?client_source=feed&format=rss

giuliana rancic notre dame football wisconsin badgers football wisconsin badgers football easter island dallas weather badgers

Congress' 'wild final month': 5 predictions for December (The Week)

New York ? A fight over unemployment insurance. Competing jobs bills. Averting a government shutdown. Clearly, Congress has one heck of a month in store

The brinksmanship and squabbling that have characterized the 112th Congress aren't going to take a holiday in December. If anything, after the collapse of the much-hyped "super committee," Congress has an unusually busy ? and potentially very ugly ? set of budget fights before Christmas. Here are five items that the House and Senate have on their daunting to-do list as they return for a "wild final month" of 2011:

1. Avert a government shutdown
The biggest item Congress has to tackle is its "most basic function: Funding for a government that has had to live with the uncertainty of endless stop-gap measures for the past 14 months," says David Rogers at?Politico. The most recent short-term budget expires Dec. 16, and Senate Democrats are proposing rolling all 2012 spending bills into a $1 trillion omnibus?bill.?That'll be thorny, says Chad Pergram at?Fox News. House GOP leaders have vowed to pass each appropriations bill separately and deliberately. They haven't, and with the clock running down, "the House GOP may have to swallow hard" and pass a spending super-bill to avoid a shutdown.

SEE MORE: The super committee's 'epic' failure: What now?

?

2. Unemployment insurance
With the unemployment rate hovering around 9 percent, Congress has extended the usual 26 weeks of unemployment benefits to up to 99 weeks. But unless lawmakers extend the payments, more than 2 million uninsured workers will be out of luck by mid-February. Republicans want tens of billions in spending cuts to pay for the proposed unemployment benefit extension. It's certainly laudable to demand offsets, says Fox News' Pergram, "but the optics of voting against the unemployed at Christmas is a different enterprise altogether."

3. Dueling jobs bills
The super committee had been dead only hours before "President Obama was already calling for Congress to enact elements of his $447 billion jobs plan," says Mike Lillis at?The Hill. Democrats argue that Obama's stymied proposals would "jump-start the economy and bring down unemployment." Republicans counter that the Democrat-controlled Senate is, in House Speaker John Boehner's (R-Ohio) words, sitting on "more than 20 bipartisan jobs bills passed by the House."

SEE MORE: Would Reagan have supported Obama's tax hike?

?

4. A payroll tax cut
A top priority for Obama and congressional Democrats is an extension ? or even expansion ? of the payroll tax holiday that expires Dec. 31. Employees paid 4.2 percent in Social Security payroll taxes this year, and without congressional action, that rate will climb to 6.2 percent in 2012. Obama actually wants to lower that tax to 3.1 percent, which would save the average family $1,500. But this is one tax cut the GOP is unenthusiastic about. They might go along with it, but at a price, and the Democrats' proposal to pay for the tax holiday with a surtax on millionaires is a nonstarter.

5. The Medicare "doc fix"
"Politicians of both parties outdo each other vying for the approval of seniors," but they've still "put Medicare in the crosshairs again" by not dealing with a looming 27 percent cut in government reimbursements for doctors who take Medicare patients, says the AP's Ricardo Alonso-Zaldivar. Every year since 2003, Congress has patched that growing gap with a "doc fix." The super committee was supposed to solve this problem by readjusting the payment schedule, but now it's up to Congress to sort out how to pay for this year's multibillion-dollar gap-filler. "There's not a lot of time to play ping-pong," a lobbyist tells the AP. "It's entirely possible given past performance that Congress misses the deadline."

SEE MORE: Can Obama save his jobs bill by splitting it up?

?

View this article on TheWeek.com
Get 4 Free Issues of The Week

Other stories from this topic:

Like on Facebook?-?Follow on Twitter?-?Sign-up for Daily Newsletter

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/oped/*http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/theweek/20111129/cm_theweek/221891

pepper spray kurt busch kurt busch storage auctions storage auctions les miles les miles

(AP)

Sorry, Readability was unable to parse this page for content.

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/europe/*http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20111130/ap_on_re_eu/eu_apnewsalert

maria shriver andy irons ethan zohn jeremy mayfield occupy oakland general strike occupy oakland general strike mike quade

ZENandTECH 25: Stress-free shopping

Our podcast feed: Audio | Video Download Directly: Audio | Video Subscribe via iTunes: Audio | Video Georgia and Rene discuss ways to de-stress your holiday shopping, and our guide to the best zen and tech gifts for 2011. This is ZENandTECH! Georgia’s...

Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheIphoneBlog/~3/tGvlsbXWtI0/story01.htm

coco rocha coco rocha al sharpton izon heart attack grill gaddafi dead steve wynn